SeqCode Registry
cognitis nomina
  • About
  • Search
  • •
  • Login
  • Register
Authors Young

JSON
See as cards

Young, J. Peter W.


Publications
2

CitationNamesAbstract
Phylogenomic analyses and reclassification of the Mesorhizobium complex: proposal for 9 novel genera and reclassification of 15 species Li et al. (2024). BMC Genomics 25 (1) Borborobacter Allomesorhizobium Aerobium Terribium Ollibium Neomesorhizobium Neoaquamicrobium Manganibacter Kumtagia
Refining the taxonomy of the order Hyphomicrobiales (Rhizobiales) based on whole genome comparisons of over 130 type strains diCenzo et al. (2024). International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 74 (4) Methylopilaceae Rhodoligotrophaceae Salaquimonadaceae Rhodoblastaceae

Phylogenomic analyses and reclassification of the Mesorhizobium complex: proposal for 9 novel genera and reclassification of 15 species
Abstract Backgroud The genus Mesorhizobium is shown by phylogenomics to be paraphyletic and forms part of a complex that includes the genera Aminobacter, Aquamicrobium, Pseudaminobacter and Tianweitania. The relationships for type strains belong to these genera need to be carefully re-evaluated. Results The relationships of Mesorhizobium complex are evaluated based on phylogenomic analyses and overall genome relatedness indices (OGRIs) of 61 type strains. According to the maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on concatenated sequences of 539 core proteins and the tree constructed using the bac120 bacterial marker set from Genome Taxonomy Database, 65 type strains were grouped into 9 clusters. Moreover, 10 subclusters were identified based on the OGRIs including average nucleotide identity (ANI), average amino acid identity (AAI) and core-proteome average amino acid identity (cAAI), with AAI and cAAI showing a clear intra- and inter-(sub)cluster gaps of 77.40–80.91% and 83.98–86.16%, respectively. Combined with the phylogenetic trees and OGRIs, the type strains were reclassified into 15 genera. This list includes five defined genera Mesorhizobium, Aquamicrobium, Pseudaminobacter, Aminobacterand Tianweitania, among which 40/41 Mesorhizobium species and one Aminobacter species are canonical legume microsymbionts. The other nine (sub)clusters are classified as novel genera. Cluster III, comprising symbiotic M. alhagi and M. camelthorni, is classified as Allomesorhizobium gen. nov. Cluster VI harbored a single symbiotic species M. albiziae and is classified as Neomesorhizobium gen. nov. The remaining seven non-symbiotic members were proposed as: Neoaquamicrobium gen. nov., Manganibacter gen. nov., Ollibium gen. nov., Terribium gen. nov., Kumtagia gen. nov., Borborobacter gen. nov., Aerobium gen. nov.. Furthermore, the genus Corticibacterium is restored and two species in Subcluster IX-1 are reclassified as the member of this genus. Conclusion The Mesorhizobium complex are classified into 15 genera based on phylogenomic analyses and OGRIs of 65 type strains. This study resolved previously non-monophyletic genera in the Mesorhizobium complex.
Refining the taxonomy of the order Hyphomicrobiales (Rhizobiales) based on whole genome comparisons of over 130 type strains
The alphaproteobacterial order Hyphomicrobiales consists of 38 families comprising at least 152 validly published genera as of January 2024. The order Hyphomicrobiales was first described in 1957 and underwent important revisions in 2020. However, we show that several inconsistencies in the taxonomy of this order remain and we argue that there is a need for a consistent framework for defining families within the order. We propose a common genome-based framework for defining families within the order Hyphomicrobiales, suggesting that families represent monophyletic groups in core-genome phylogenies that share pairwise average amino acid identity values above ~75 % when calculated from a core set of 59 proteins. Applying this framework, we propose the formation of four new families and to reassign the genera Salaquimonas, Rhodoblastus, and Rhodoligotrophos into Salaquimonadaceae fam. nov., Rhodoblastaceae fam. nov., and Rhodoligotrophaceae fam. nov., respectively, and the genera Albibacter, Chenggangzhangella, Hansschlegelia, and Methylopila into Methylopilaceae fam. nov. We further propose to unify the families Bartonellaceae, Brucellaceae, Phyllobacteriaceae, and Notoacmeibacteraceae as Bartonellaceae; the families Segnochrobactraceae and Pseudoxanthobacteraceae as Segnochrobactraceae; the families Lichenihabitantaceae and Lichenibacteriaceae as Lichenihabitantaceae; and the families Breoghaniaceae and Stappiaceae as Stappiaceae. Lastly, we propose to reassign several genera to existing families. Specifically, we propose to reassign the genus Pseudohoeflea to the family Rhizobiaceae; the genera Oricola, Roseitalea, and Oceaniradius to the family Ahrensiaceae; the genus Limoniibacter to the emended family Bartonellaceae; the genus Faunimonas to the family Afifellaceae; and the genus Pseudochelatococcus to the family Chelatococcaceae. Our data also support the recent proposal to reassign the genus Prosthecomicrobium to the family Kaistiaceae.
Search