SeqCode Logo SeqCode Registry
cognitis nomina
  • About
  • Search
  • •
  • Login
  • Register
Authors Gottwald

JSON
See as cards

Gottwald, Tim


Publications
3

CitationNamesAbstract
Geospatial Risk-Based Survey Model for ‘ Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ Detection in Residential Citrus Populations in California Luo et al. (2026). Plant Disease Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus
Text
Susceptibility of Sixteen Citrus Genotypes to ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ McCollum et al. (2016). Plant Disease 100 (6) Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus
Text
First Report of Dodder Transmission of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ to Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) Duan et al. (2008). Plant Disease 92 (5) Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus
Text

Geospatial Risk-Based Survey Model for ‘ Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ Detection in Residential Citrus Populations in California
Citrus huanglongbing (HLB), associated with the bacterium ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ and spread by the Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri; ACP), poses a significant threat to California’s citrus industry. First identified in Los Angeles in 2012, HLB has since spread through residential areas across Southern California. A risk-based survey (RBS) model has been developed to improve HLB surveillance and intervention. Within this framework, model components change as HLB dynamics shift, requiring regular updates to maintain data accuracy and model reliability. Disease spread is influenced by natural factors, such as ACP establishment and confirmed HLB locations, as well as human-mediated factors like global mobility (travel introduction from HLB-infected countries), transportation of citrus materials, nurseries, packinghouses, farmers’ markets, and proximity to private or otherwise inaccessible lands. Human-mediated risk factors account for approximately 26.3% (18.4 to 38.4%) of HLB incidence across different years, and natural causes predominantly explain the remaining 73.7% (61.6 to 81.7%). Notably, global mobility was crucial for early HLB detection in new areas, whereas ACP density strongly correlated with disease spread once established. A retrospective analysis from 2015 to 2022 evaluated the RBS model’s performance, showing a predictive power of 88 to 97%, which confirms its validity for developing targeted interventions and early detection strategies in California.
Susceptibility of Sixteen Citrus Genotypes to ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’
Huanglongbing (HLB) disease is the most serious threat to citrus production worldwide and, in the last decade, has devastated the Florida citrus industry. In the United States, HLB is associated with the phloem-limited α-proteobacterium ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ and its insect vector, the Asian citrus psyllid (ACP; Diaphorina citri). Significant effort is being put forth to develop novel citrus germplasm that has a lower propensity to succumb to HLB than do currently available varieties. Effective methods of screening citrus germplasm for susceptibility to HLB are essential. In this study, we exposed small, grafted trees of 16 citrus types to free-ranging ACP vectors and ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ inoculum in the greenhouse. During 45 weeks of exposure to ACP, the cumulative incidence of ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ infection was 70%. Trees of Citrus macrophylla and C. medica were most susceptible to ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’, with 100% infection by the end of the test period in three trials, while the complex genetic hybrids ‘US 1-4-59’ and ‘Fallglo’ consistently were least susceptible, with approximately 30% infection. Results obtained in this greenhouse experiment showed good agreement with trends observed in the orchard, supporting the validity of our approach for screening citrus germplasm for susceptibility to HLB.
First Report of Dodder Transmission of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ to Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)
Citrus huanglongbing (HLB) is one of the most devastating diseases of citrus worldwide. The disease is associated with three different species of fastidious α-proteobacteria, namely ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’, Ca. L. americanus, and Ca. L. africanus (1). ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ was first detected in South Florida in 2005 and has spread throughout the citrus-growing areas of Florida. ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ is transmitted naturally by the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, and can also be transmitted by graft propagation and via various species of dodder (Cuscuta). HLB affects most if not all citrus and citrus relatives within the family Rutaceae (2), including the ornamental shrub Murraya paniculata (4). In addition, ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ and ‘Ca. L. americanus’ can infect tobacco (Nicotiana xanthi) and periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus) (1,4). Here we report that ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ can infect tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cvs. Manapal and FL47. Manapal and FL 47 plants grown from seed were placed adjacent to ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’-infected sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) plants with dodder (Cuscuta pentagona) already well established on them. Young dodder shoots still connected to the citrus were draped over the tomato plants and subsequently also became attached to the tomato stems. After 1 month, the tomato plants were detached from the citrus and most of the dodder removed. One month later, these tomato plants started to show vein clearing and subsequently the mature leaves became thicker and leathery. Some leaves showed blotchy mottle symptoms and some fruits became lopsided in a manner similar to HLB symptom expression on citrus. PCR amplification of the ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ 16S rDNA with primers OI1/OI2c and the β-operon with primers A2/J5 (1) revealed the presence of ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ DNA. Sequence analysis confirmed that the sequences of the cloned amplicons were identical to those from the HLB-infected citrus source plant. Both conventional and quantitative real-time PCR (3) revealed a much lower abundance of ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ DNA in tomato as compared with ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’-infected citrus or periwinkle, indicating that ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ bacteria multiplied at a lower titer in these tomato cultivars. References: (1) J. M. Bové, J. Plant Pathol. 88:7, 2006. (2) S. E. Halbert et al. Fla. Entomol. 87:330, 2004. (3) W. Li et al. J. Microbiol. Methods 66:104, 2006. (4) L. Z. Zhou et al. Plant Dis. 91:227, 2007.
Search