ABSTRACT
To estimate the likelihood of people coming into contact with the recently described tick-borne agent “
Candidatus
Neoehrlichia mikurensis,” we compared its prevalence to those of Lyme disease spirochetes and
Anaplasma phagocytophilum
in questing adult
Ixodes ricinus
ticks collected in various Central European sites and examined ticks, which had been removed from people, for the presence of these pathogens. Whereas spirochetes infected questing adult ticks most frequently (22.3%), fewer than a third as many ticks were infected by “
Ca
. Neoehrlichia mikurensis” (6.2%), and about a sixth harbored
A. phagocytophilum
(3.9%). On average, every twelfth encounter of a person with an
I. ricinus
tick (8.1%) may bear the risk of acquiring “
Ca
. Neoehrlichia mikurensis.” Although a fifth of the people (20%) had removed at least one tick infected by “
Ca
. Neoehrlichia mikurensis,” none displayed symptoms described for this pathogen, suggesting that its transmission may not be immediate and/or that immunocompetent individuals may not be affected. Because immunosuppressed patients may be at a particular risk of developing symptoms, it should be considered that “
Ca
. Neoehrlichia mikurensis” appears to be the second most common pathogen in
I. ricinus
ticks. In our survey, only
Borrelia afzelii
appears to infect Central European vector ticks more frequently.