Publications
23
| Citation | Title | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cui et al., 2025, Phytopathology® | Draft Genome of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri’ and Phylogenetic Diversity Among Chilean and Italian Strains | ||
| Alessio et al., 2025, PhytoFrontiers™ | Draft Genome Sequence of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri’ Strain P1, the Causal Agent of Pear Decline Disease | ||
| Alessio et al., 2025, | First genomic resource of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri’ associated to pear | ||
| Sharon et al., 2025, Phytopathogenic mollicutes | Seasonal dispersal of Cacopsylla bidens and its role in the epidemiology of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri’ in mixed-crop systems | ||
| Tomer et al., 2025, Phytopathogenic mollicutes | First identification of Cacopsylla bidens as a vector of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri’, the agent associated with pear decline | ||
| Zamorano et al., 2023, Phytopathogenic Mollicutes | Multilocus RFLP characterization of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri’ strains in pear from Chile and Italy | ||
| Riedle-Bauer et al., 2022, Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection | Vector transmission and epidemiology of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri’ in Austria and identification of Cacopsylla pyrisuga as new pathogen vector | ||
| Valentová et al., 2022, Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca | A survey of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri’ isolates in the Czech Republic based on imp gene genotyping | ||
| Nečas et al., 2021, Acta Horticulturae | Monitoring the occurrence of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri’ depending on the pear cultivars in the Czech Republic | ||
| Gazel et al., 2020, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi | Detection of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri’in different pear tissues and sampling time by PCR-RFLP analyses |