Chuvochina, Maria


Publications
18

Candidatus Eremiobacterota, a metabolically and phylogenetically diverse terrestrial phylum with acid-tolerant adaptations

Citation
Ji et al. (2021). The ISME Journal 15 (9)
Names
Eremiobacterota Mawsoniella Mawsoniella australis Ts “Cryoxeromicrobium” “Cryoxeromicrobium davisii” Nyctobacter Nyctobacter psychrophilus Ts Erabacter Erabacter solicola Ts “Hesperobacter” “Hesperobacter lustricola” Meridianibacter Meridianibacter frigidus Ts “Aquilonibacter” “Aquilonibacter stordalenmirensis” Tyrphobacter Tyrphobacter aquilonaris Ts Tumulicola Tumulicola scandinaviensis Ts Cybelea Cybelea septentrionalis Ts Cybelea tumulisoli “Cybelea tyrphae” Cybelea palsarum “Palsibacter” “Palsibacter borealis” “Hemerobacter” “Hemerobacter limicola” Velthaea Velthaea versatilis Ts Lustribacter “Lustribacter caenicola” Lustribacter telmatis Ts Elarobacter Elarobacter winogradskyi Ts “Elarobacter vanleeuwenhoeki” “Elarobacter pasteuri” “Elarobacter beijerinckii” Tityobacter Tityobacter terrigena Ts Xenobium Xenobium occultum Ts Bruticola Bruticola papionis Ts “Xenobium purgamenti” Xenobiaceae Eremiobacterales Eremiobacteraceae Eremiobacter Eremiobacter antarcticus Ts Eremiobacteria Zemelea palustris Ts Zemelea Xenobiales Xenobiia
Abstract
Abstract Candidatus phylum Eremiobacterota (formerly WPS-2) is an as-yet-uncultured bacterial clade that takes its name from Ca. Eremiobacter, an Antarctic soil aerobe proposed to be capable of a novel form of chemolithoautotrophy termed atmospheric chemosynthesis, that uses the energy derived from atmospheric H2-oxidation to fix CO2 through the Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle via type 1E RuBisCO. To elucidate the phylogenetic affiliation and metabolic capacities of Ca. Eremioba

Proposal to reclassify the proteobacterial classes Deltaproteobacteria and Oligoflexia, and the phylum Thermodesulfobacteria into four phyla reflecting major functional capabilities

Citation
Waite et al. (2020). International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 70 (11)
Names
Myxococcia Polyangiia Pseudobdellovibrionaceae Bdellovibrionota Oligoflexia “Desulfofervidales” Ca. Desulfofervidaceae Ca. Desulfofervidus “Desulfofervidia” Ca. Magnetomorum “Magnetomoraceae” “Adiutricaceae” Ca. Adiutrix Myxococcota “Adiutricales”
Abstract
The class Deltaproteobacteria comprises an ecologically and metabolically diverse group of bacteria best known for dissimilatory sulphate reduction and predatory behaviour. Although this lineage is the fourth described class of the phylum Proteobacteria , it rarely affiliates with other proteobacterial classes and is freque

Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa

Citation
Oren et al. (2020). International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 70 (7)
Names
“Huberarchaeum crystalense” “Huberarchaeum” Ca. Allofontibacter Ca. Allofontibacter communis “Fermentibacteria” Ca. Fermentibacter danicus Ca. Fermentibacter Ca. Fermentibacteraceae “Fermentibacterales” “Methanofastidiosia” Ca. Methanofastidiosum Ca. Methanofastidiosum methylothiophilum Ca. Carsonella Ca. Carsonella ruddii “Altiarchaeum” Ca. Methylumidiphilus alinenensis Ca. Caldarchaeum Kryptonium thompsonii Ts “Sulfuripaludibacter” “Sulfuritelmatobacter” Sulfuritelmatomonas “Izemoplasma acidinucleici” Cloacimonas acidaminivorans Ts Cloacimonas Ca. Methanomethylicia Ca. Methanomethylicus Ca. Methanomethylicus mesodigestus Ca. Methanomethylicus oleisabuli “Methanosuratincola petrocarbonis” “Methanosuratincola” Ca. Branchiomonas cystocola Kapaibacterium Kapaibacterium thiocyanatum Ts Muiribacterium halophilum Ts Promineifilum Promineifilum breve Ts “Accumulibacter aalborgensis” “Acetithermum autotrophicum” “Aciduliprofundum boonei” “Actinochlamydia clariatis” “Actinochlamydia pangasianodontis” “Actinomarina minuta” “Adiacens aphidicola” “Aenigmatarchaeum subterraneum” “Aerophobus profundus” “Allobeggiatoa salina” “Allocryptoplasma californiense” “Allospironema culicis” “Altiarchaeum hamiconexum” “Altimarinus pacificus” “Aminicenans sakinawicola” “Amoebinatus massiliensis” “Amoebophilus asiaticus” “Amphibiichlamydia ranarum” “Amphibiichlamydia salamandrae” “Anammoxiglobus propionicus” “Anammoximicrobium moscoviense” “Aquiluna rubra” “Atelocyanobacterium thalassae” “Bandiella euplotis” “Blochmanniella camponoti” “Blochmanniella floridana” “Blochmanniella myrmotrichis” “Blochmanniella pennsylvanica” “Blochmanniella vafra” “Brevifilum fermentans” “Brocadia anammoxidans” “Brocadia sapporonensis” “Caenarcanum bioreactoricola” “Caldarchaeum subterraneum” “Caldatribacterium californiense” “Caldatribacterium saccharofermentans” “Calditenuis aerorheumatis” “Calescibacterium nevadense” “Captivus acidiprotistae” “Carbonibacillus altaicus” “Cardinium hertigii” “Catenimonas italica” “Cenarchaeum symbiosum” “Chloranaerofilum corporosum” “Chloroploca asiatica” “Chlorotrichoides halophilum” “Chryseopegocella kryptomonas” “Clavichlamydia salmonicola” “Cochliopodiiphilus cryoturris” “Combothrix italica” “Competibacter denitrificans” “Competibacter phosphatis” “Consessor aphidicola” “Contendibacter odensensis” “Contubernalis alkaliaceticus” “Criblamydia sequanensis” “Criblamydia” “Cryptoprodota polytropus” “Curculioniphilus buchneri” “Cyrtobacter comes” “Dactylopiibacterium carminicum” “Desulfofervidus auxilii” “Desulfonatronobulbus propionicus” “Doolittlea endobia” “Ecksteinia adelgidicola” “Electronema nielsenii” “Electronema palustre” Electrothrix arhusiensis Electrothrix communis Ts “Electrothrix japonica” “Electrothrix marina” “Endecteinascidia fromenterensis” “Endobugula glebosa” “Endobugula sertula” “Endolissoclinum faulkneri” “Endonucleibacter bathymodioli” “Endoriftia persephonae” “Endowatersipora glebosa” “Entotheonella factor” “Entotheonella palauensis” “Entotheonella serta” “Epixenosoma ejectans” “Epulonipiscioides gigas” “Epulonipiscioides saccharophilum” “Epulonipiscium fischelsonii” Fervidibacter sacchari Ts “Finniella inopinata” “Finniella lucida” “Finniella” “Flaviluna lacus” “Fodinibacter communicans” “Fokinia crypta” “Fokinia solitaria” “Fritschea bemisiae” “Fritschea eriococci” “Fukatsuia symbiotica” “Galacturonatibacter soehngenii” “Mariprofundia” “Moduliflexia” “Thermofontia” “Vecturitrichia” “Actinomarinales” “Altiarchaeales” “Gastranaerophilales” “Moduliflexales” “Nitrosocaldales” “Vecturitrichales” “Accumulibacter phosphatis” Sulfuritelmatomonas gaucii Ts Electronema aureum Ts Electronema Electrothrix Fervidibacter
Abstract
We here present annotated lists of names ofCandidatustaxa of prokaryotes with ranks between subspecies and class, proposed between the mid-1990s, when the provisional status ofCandidatustaxa was first established, and the end of 2018. Where necessary, corrected names are proposed that comply with the current provisions of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes and its Orthography appendix. These lists, as well as updated lists of newly published names ofCandidatustaxa with additio

A phylogenomic and ecological analysis of the globally abundant Marine Group II archaea (Ca. Poseidoniales ord. nov.)

Citation
Rinke et al. (2019). The ISME Journal 13 (3)
Names
Poseidoniia Thalassarchaeum betae Ts Thalassarchaeum Poseidoniaceae Poseidonia Poseidonia alphae Ts Thalassarchaeaceae Poseidoniales Ca. Poseidonaceae “Nanohalarchaeota” “Poseidoniota”
Abstract
Abstract Marine Group II (MGII) archaea represent the most abundant planktonic archaeal group in ocean surface waters, but our understanding of the group has been limited by a lack of cultured representatives and few sequenced genomes. Here, we conducted a comparative phylogenomic analysis of 270 recently available MGII metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) to investigate their evolution and ecology. Based on a rank-normalised genome phylogeny, we propose that MGII is an order-level

Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life

Citation
Parks et al. (2017). Nature Microbiology 2 (11)
Names
Binatus soli Ts Binatus
Abstract
AbstractChallenges in cultivating microorganisms have limited the phylogenetic diversity of currently available microbial genomes. This is being addressed by advances in sequencing throughput and computational techniques that allow for the cultivation-independent recovery of genomes from metagenomes. Here, we report the reconstruction of 7,903 bacterial and archaeal genomes from >1,500 public metagenomes. All genomes are estimated to be ≥50% complete and nearly half are ≥90% complete with ≤5%