SeqCode Registry
cognitis nomina
  • About
  • Search
  • •
  • Login
  • Register
Authors Massart

JSON
See as cards

Massart, S.


Publications
5

CitationNamesAbstract
First Report of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ Infecting Plum (Prunus domestica) in Jordan Salem et al. (2020). Plant Disease 104 (2) Ca. Phytoplasma solani
First Report of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma aurantifolia’-Related Strains Infecting Potato (Solanum tuberosum) in Jordan Salem et al. (2019). Plant Disease 103 (6) Ca. Phytoplasma aurantifolia
First Report of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ Associated With the Psyllid Bactericera trigonica Hodkinson on Carrots in Northern Africa Tahzima et al. (2017). Plant Disease 101 (1) “Liberibacter solanacearum”
A simple and rapid protocol of crude DNA extraction from apple trees for PCR and real-time PCR detection of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma mali’ Aldaghi et al. (2009). Journal of Virological Methods 156 (1-2) Ca. Phytoplasma mali
Development of a new probe for specific and sensitive detection of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma mali’ in inoculated apple trees Aldaghi et al. (2007). Annals of Applied Biology 151 (2) Ca. Phytoplasma mali
Text

Development of a new probe for specific and sensitive detection of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma mali’ in inoculated apple trees
AbstractA new TaqMan minor groove binding (MGB) probe and new PCR conditions were designed for quick, specific and sensitive detection of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma mali’. The new probe can distinguish a single mismatch between ‘Ca. P. mali’ and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma prunorum’, this constituting an improvement over a previously published method. In our study, the relative position of the mismatch in the MGB probe influenced greatly the specificity of detection. Our new real‐time PCR protocol was able to detect one plasmid copy in water and 100 copies in healthy plant DNA extracts. The sensitivity of this new real‐time PCR method, three other real‐time PCR protocols and a conventional PCR with fU5/rU3 primers was compared. Periwinkles and MM106 rootstocks were grafted with infected material and surveyed over time by symptom observation, conventional PCR and real‐time PCR. Phytoplasma infection was detected by symptom observation in all periwinkles within 4 months and in 75% of the MM106 rootstocks by the end of 7 months. Conventional PCR detected phytoplasma infection in all periwinkles within 4 months and in all MM106 rootstocks within 7 months. Best results were obtained by our real‐time PCR, which detected phytoplasma infection in all grafted plants within 3 months after inoculation.
Search