Publications

4506

Comparison of the metabolic changes prior to symptom development upon infection with Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas), the bacterium associated with citrus greening disease, between citrus hosts with different tolerances is lacking. The objective of this study was to compare the early response of Lisbon lemon (Citrus limon) and Washington navel orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck), two citrus species commercially important to California, to CLas through graft inoculation. Here, we compare the transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome response, using RNA sequencing, liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance, respectively, from our two recently published studies examining the response of the lemon and navel oranges separately, and introduce new micronutrient data from inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis, focusing on lemons at 10 and 14 weeks postgrafting (wpg), and navels at 8 and 18 wpg, prior to symptom development. Several micronutrients accumulated in presymptomatic infected lemons compared with controls, whereas little change was observed in the navels. Photosynthesis proteins were substantially altered by CLas infection in navels, with fewer changes observed in lemons. The metabolome differed between control and infected navels throughout infection, although differences between control and infected lemons were identified only after symptom expression. Taken together, these findings highlight differences in response to CLas between two varieties with differing tolerances. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .

Abstract RUS is of considerable economic importance, especially in areas where outbreaks occur. It has been described as a serious and widespread problem of raspberry in the former Soviet Union (see van der Meer (1987) for references). After the First World War, the disease became disastrous in raspberry areas in southern parts of The Netherlands, and many young plantations, started with healthy plant material, contained 60-90% infected plants in the second year after planting (see van der Meer (1987) for references). Small outbreaks and/or incidental occurrences of RUS disease have been reported from several other European countries (van der Meer, 1987).

Abstract Me.tha.no.tri.cha'les. N.L. fem. n. Methanothrix type genus of the order; suff. ‐ ales the ending to denote an order; N.L. fem. pl. n. Methanotrichales the order of Methanothrix . Cells are nonmotile, sheathed rods with flat ends. Gram‐stain negative. Lipids contain myo ‐inositol, ethanolamine, and galactose as the polar head groups. Species are oxygen‐tolerant anaerobe. However, growth and methanogenesis can only occur in strictly anaerobic and highly reducing conditions. Energy is obtained by splitting acetate into methane and CO 2 . When cocultured with electrogenic Geobacter spp., CO 2 is reduced to methane via direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET). Optimum growth pH range is 7.0–7.8. Mesophilic and thermophilic. Optimum growth temperatures are 34–37°C for mesophilic strains and 55–60°C for thermophilic strains. They occupy a wide range of anoxic habitats including anaerobic river mud, paddy field soil, hot springs, thermal lakes, thermophilic, and mesophilic anaerobic wastewater digesters treating domestic wastes; granular sludge, anaerobic fixed‐bed reactors, and other types of anaerobic systems. Genome sequences have been determined for strains of all three of the described species in the order, and the genome size ranges from 1.9 to 3.0 Mb. The order Methanotrichales consists of one family Methanotrichaceae . Although all three described species are currently classified in a single genus Methanothrix , phylogenomic analyses suggest that two species should be transferred to novel genera. DNA G + C content (mol%) : 51–61 (Genome). Type genus : Methanothrix Huser et al. 1982, VL10. Taxonomic and Nomenclature Notes According to the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN), the taxonomic status of the order Methanotrichales is: synonym (and no standing) (last update, February 2025) * . Correct name: Methanosarcinales LPSN classification: Archaea / Methanobacteriati / Methanobacteriota / Methanosarcinia / Methanosarcinales The order Methanotrichales can also be recovered in the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) as o__Methanotrichales (version v220) ** . GTDB classification: d__Archaea / p__Halobacteriota / c__Methanosarcinia / o__Methanotrichales * Meier‐Kolthoff et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D801 – D807 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab902 ** Parks et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D785 – D794 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab776