Publications

4560

Greenhouse tomato growers from Fort Lupton, CO contacted the USDA-ARS-USHRL in 2002 regarding plant symptoms resembling “psyllid yellows” associated with Bactericera cockerelli (Sulc) infestations that initially begin as retarded growth, erectness of new growth, chlorosis, and purpling of leaves followed by widespread chlorosis and production of many small, poor-quality fruit (1). Symptoms appeared ≈6 weeks after psyllids were observed and were generally restricted to the top half of the plant. Leaf cuttings from beefsteak tomatoes cv. Quest were immediately placed in RNAlater (Applied Biosystems, Austin, TX). Samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic plants were collected in September and December of 2002. At each date, leaves were sampled from multiple plants and placed in separate RNAlater bottles. September samples exhibited initial “psyllid yellows” symptoms and December samples exhibited severe symptoms. Samples remained at 4°C in RNAlater for 6 years until recent findings suggested that a new species of bacteria, named either “Candidatus Liberibacter psyllaurous” (2) or “Ca. L. solanacearum” (3), may be the causal agent of “psyllid yellows”. The Qiagen (Valencia, CA) DNeasy Plant Kit and recommended protocols were used for four separate DNA isolations from each of the four tomato samples that had previously remained unopened. Five PCR primer pairs designed to amplify three distinct genetic regions within the “Ca L. psyllaurous” rrn operon (16S rRNA, 16S-23S rRNA intergenic region, and 23S rRNA) were used and one primer pair specific to the tomato DNA (18S rRNA gene) that successfully amplified from all samples was used as a positive control. Bacterial primers included one pair designed specifically for 16S rRNA sequences of ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’, ‘americanus’, and ‘africanus’ species (USHRL-CL1) and four sets, Lp-1 through Lp-4, previously described (2) that amplify nonoverlapping regions of the 16S-23S rRNA operon. The USHRL-CL1 primers (USHRL-CL1f: 5′-CTTACCAGCCCTTGACATGTATAGGA-3′, and USHRL-CL1r: 5′-TCCCTATAAAGTACCCAACATCTAGGTAAA-3′) amplify a 195-bp fragment from bp 895 to 1,089 of the ‘Ca. Liberibacter’ sp. 16S rRNA Genbank Accession No. L22532. Only samples from severe symptomatic plants collected in December 2002 yielded amplicons that were purified and sequenced (Genbank: USHRL-CL1, FJ871062; Lp-1, FJ871058; Lp-2, FJ871059; Lp-3, FJ871060; Lp-4, FJ871061). For each bacterial primer pair, the fragment amplified was highly homologous (98 to 100% identity) to “Ca. L. psyllaurous” rRNA gene/intergenic space sequences. The 16S rRNA coding region was identical to two GenBank ‘Ca. Liberibacter’ sp. entries: EU921627 and EU921626 from B. cockerelli samples collected in Dalhart, TX and zebra chip potato samples from Garden City, KS, respectively; however, the whole 2,500 bp amplified and sequenced from our sample contained 11 to 14 polymorphisms when compared to nine “Ca. L. psyllaurous” sequences. Our results clearly indicate that “Ca. L. psyllaurous” isolates were associated with tomato “psyllid yellows” symptoms in Colorado as early as 2002 and significant sequence variation exists within the 16S/23S rRNA intergenic region and 23S rRNA coding region to allow analysis of genetic diversity among “Ca. L. psyllaurous” isolates. References: (1) L. B. Daniels. Ph.D. diss. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, 1954. (2) A. K. Hansen et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:5862, 2008. (3) L. W. Liefting et al. Plant Dis. 93:208, 2009.

Plantas de hibisco com superbrotamento e definhamento seguido de morte têm sido observadas nos municípios de São Paulo, Campinas e Piracicaba. Como os sintomas são sugestivos daqueles induzidos por fitoplasmas, o presente trabalho buscou identificar o possível fitoplasma associado com a doença. Assim, 14 plantas sintomáticas de hibisco foram coletadas em Piracicaba (SP) e submetidas ao PCR duplo com os primers P1/Tint-R16F2n/R2 e ao exame em microscópio eletrônico de transmissão. A identificação foi realizada por análise de RFLP com as enzimas de restrição BfaI, DraI, HaeIII, HhaI, HpaII, MboI, MseI, RsaI e TaqI. Testes de transmissão foram conduzidos com enxertia de ramos e uso de Cuscuta subinclusa. Os resultados de nested-PCR revelaram a presença consistente de fitoplasmas em todas as plantas sintomáticas e foram confirmados pela observação de corpúsculos pleomórficos no floema, através da microscopia eletrônica. A análise de RFLP mostrou que o fitoplasma encontrado em hibisco pertence ao grupo 16SrXV, o mesmo grupo do Candidatus Phytoplasma brasiliense. O fitoplasma foi transmitido de planta doente para sadia, tanto pela enxertia como pela C. subinclusa, demonstrando ser o agente do superbrotamento do hibisco.

In January of 2009, potato plants (Solanum tuberosum) from a commercial crop in the Waikato Region, New Zealand were observed to have symptoms of upward rolling and purpling of the leaves. The symptoms appeared similar to those of “zebra chip”, a disorder of potato recently found to be associated with ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ in New Zealand and the United States (4). Total DNA from the leaf midveins and tubers from one of the symptomatic plants was separately extracted with an InviMag Plant DNA Mini Kit (Invitek GmbH, Berlin, Germany) and a KingFisher mL workstation (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). DNA extracted from leaf midveins and tubers tested negative for ‘Ca. L. solanacearum’ by nested-PCR using primer pair OA2/OI2c (4) followed by Lib16S01F/Lib16S01R (5′-TTCTACGGGATAACGCACGG-3′ and 5′-CGTCAGTATCAGGCCAGTGAG-3′), which amplifies a 580-bp region of the 16S rRNA gene. However, DNA extracted from the tuber tissue tested positive for phytoplasma by TaqMan real-time PCR (3). No phytoplasma was detected in the DNA extracted from leaf tissue. The 16S rRNA gene, 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region, and part of the 23S rRNA gene of the phytoplasma were amplified with primers P1/P7 (1). The PCR product was cloned into the pCR 4-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and sequenced (GenBank Accession No. FJ943262). BLAST analysis showed 100% identity to ‘Ca. Phytoplasma australiense’ (16SrXII, Stolbur group). A fragment of approximately 850-bp of the Tuf gene was also amplified (2) and sequenced directly (GenBank Accession No. FJ943263). BLAST analysis showed 100% identity to Tuf gene variant IX of ‘Ca. P. australiense’ (2). An additional 14 plants showing similar leaf symptoms and also production of aerial tubers were collected from seven different potato fields from the Auckland and Waikato regions. Total DNA from the leaf midveins, stem, and tubers were separately extracted from each of the plants. The samples were tested for phytoplasma by nested-PCR using primer pair R16F2/R16R2, followed by NGF/NGR (1), and tested for ‘Ca. L. solanacearum’ by nested-PCR as described above. Seven plants tested positive only for phytoplasma, three tested positive for only ‘Ca. L. solanacearum’, and four plants tested positive for both pathogens. The pathogens were most commonly detected in samples extracted from the stem with 9 and 5 of the 14 samples testing positive for phytoplasma and liberibacter, respectively. Six of each of the leaf and tuber samples tested positive for phytoplasma. Liberibacter was detected in one of the leaf samples and in four of the tuber samples. ‘Ca. P. australiense’ has only been reported from New Zealand and Australia. The only other known hosts of ‘Ca. P. australiense’ in New Zealand are strawberry and native plants belonging to the genera Cordyline, Coprosma, and Phormium (2). In Australia, ‘Ca. P. australiense’ is associated with Australian grapevine yellows and Papaya dieback (2). To our knowledge, this is the first report of ‘Ca. P. australiense’ infecting potato as well as the first report of phytoplasma and ‘Ca. L. solanacearum’ mixed infections in potato. References: (1) M. T. Andersen et al. Plant Pathol. 47:188, 1998. (2) M. T. Andersen et al. Phytopathology 96:838, 2006. (3) N. M. Christensen et al. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 17:1175, 2004. (4) L. W. Liefting et al. Plant Dis. 93:208, 2009.

The study and revision of the unicellular cyanobacterial genus Synechocystis was based on the type species S. aquatilis Sauv. and strain PCC 6803, a reference strain for this species. Uniformity in rRNA gene sequence, morphology, and ultrastructure was observed in all available Synechocystis strains, with the exception of the strain PCC 6308, which has been considered by some to be a model strain for Synechocystis. This strain differs substantially from the typical Synechocystis cluster according to both molecular (<90% of similarity, differences in 16S–23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer [ITS] secondary structure) and phenotypic criteria (different ultrastructure of cells). This strain is herein classified into the new genus Geminocystis gen. nov., as a sister taxon to the genus Cyanobacterium. Geminocystis differs from Cyanobacterium by genetic position (<94.4% of similarity) and more importantly by its different type of cell division. Because strain PCC 6308 was designated as a reference strain of the Synechocystis cluster 1 in Bergey’s Manual, the members of this genetic cluster have to be revised and reclassified into Geminocystis gen. nov. Only the members of the Synechocystis cluster 2 allied with PCC 6803 correspond both genetically and phenotypically to the type species of the genus Synechocystis (S. aquatilis).