Publications

4467

AbstractBased on molecular data, previous studies have suggested a high overall diversity and co‐infection rates of Bartonella bacteria in wild rodents and their fleas. However, partial genetic characterization of uncultured co‐infecting bacteria limited sound conclusions concerning intra‐ and inter‐specific diversity of the circulating Bartonella. To overcome this limitation, Bartonella infections of wild populations of two sympatric gerbil species and their fleas were explored by multiple isolations of Bartonella organisms. Accordingly, 448 pure Bartonella isolates, obtained from 20 rodent blood and 39 flea samples, were genetically characterized to the genotype and species levels. Results revealed a remarkable diversity and co‐infection rates of Bartonella among these sympatric rodents and their associated fleas. Specifically, 38 genotypes, classified into four main Bartonella species, were identified. Co‐infection was confirmed in 56% of the samples, which contained two to four Bartonella genotypes per sample, belonging to up to three different species. Recombination within and between these species was demonstrated, serving as a direct evidence of the frequent bacteria–bacteria interactions. Moreover, despite the noticeable interchange of common Bartonella genotypes between rodents and fleas, the co‐occurrence of genotypes was not random and differences in the overall diversity, and the ecological and phylogenetic similarities of the infection compositions were significantly associated with the carrier type (rodent vs. flea) and the rodent species. Thus, comprehensive identification of the co‐infecting organisms enabled the elucidation of ecological factors affecting the Bartonella distribution among reservoirs and vectors. This study may serve as a model for the investigation of other vector‐borne organisms and their relationships with Bartonella.

Abstract Nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) play a critical role in the mitigation of nitrogen pollution by metabolizing nitrite to nitrate, which is removed via assimilation, denitrification, or anammox. Recent studies showed that NOB are phylogenetically and metabolically diverse, yet most of our knowledge of NOB comes from only a few cultured representatives. Using cultivation and genomic sequencing, we identified four putative Candidatus Nitrotoga NOB species from freshwater sediments and water column samples in Colorado, USA. Genome analyses indicated highly conserved 16S rRNA gene sequences, but broad metabolic potential including genes for nitrogen, sulfur, hydrogen, and organic carbon metabolism. Genomic predictions suggested that Ca. Nitrotoga can metabolize in low oxygen or anoxic conditions, which may support an expanded environmental niche for Ca. Nitrotoga similar to other NOB. An array of antibiotic and metal resistance genes likely allows Ca. Nitrotoga to withstand environmental pressures in impacted systems. Phylogenetic analyses highlighted a deeply divergent nitrite oxidoreductase alpha subunit (NxrA), suggesting a novel evolutionary trajectory for Ca. Nitrotoga separate from any other NOB and further revealing the complex evolutionary history of nitrite oxidation in the bacterial domain. Ca. Nitrotoga-like 16S rRNA gene sequences were prevalent in globally distributed environments over a range of reported temperatures. This work considerably expands our knowledge of the Ca. Nitrotoga genus and suggests that their contribution to nitrogen cycling should be considered alongside other NOB in wide variety of habitats.

Specific scopeThis Standard describes the procedures for inspection of places of production of plants for planting which are susceptible to ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri’. The scope of a place of production inspection may be for export, for internal country movements of materials or as an element of a national survey. Further inspections would be needed to determine freedom of a country or area from the pest concerned. This Standard does not cover eradication or containment measures in infested areas or measures needed to establish and maintain pest‐free places of production within areas where the pest is known to occur. It provides more detailed guidance to supplement EPPO Standard PM 3/76 (1) Trees of Malus, Pyrus, Cydonia and Prunus spp. – inspection of places of production.