Publications
3734

Sort by date names
Browse by authors subjects journals

Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa

Citation
Oren et al. (2020). International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 70 (7)
Names
“Huberarchaeum crystalense” “Huberarchaeum” Ca. Allofontibacter Ca. Allofontibacter communis “Fermentibacteria” Ca. Fermentibacter danicus Ca. Fermentibacter Ca. Fermentibacteraceae “Fermentibacterales” “Methanofastidiosia” Ca. Methanofastidiosum Ca. Methanofastidiosum methylothiophilum Ca. Carsonella Ca. Carsonella ruddii “Altiarchaeum” Ca. Methylumidiphilus alinenensis Ca. Caldarchaeum Kryptonium thompsonii Ts “Sulfuripaludibacter” “Sulfuritelmatobacter” Sulfuritelmatomonas “Izemoplasma acidinucleici” Cloacimonas acidaminivorans Ts Cloacimonas Ca. Methanomethylicia Ca. Methanomethylicus Ca. Methanomethylicus mesodigestus Ca. Methanomethylicus oleisabuli “Methanosuratincola petrocarbonis” “Methanosuratincola” Ca. Branchiomonas cystocola Kapaibacterium Kapaibacterium thiocyanatum Ts Muiribacterium halophilum Ts Promineifilum Promineifilum breve Ts “Accumulibacter aalborgensis” “Acetithermum autotrophicum” “Aciduliprofundum boonei” “Actinochlamydia clariatis” “Actinochlamydia pangasianodontis” “Actinomarina minuta” “Adiacens aphidicola” “Aenigmatarchaeum subterraneum” “Aerophobus profundus” “Allobeggiatoa salina” “Allocryptoplasma californiense” “Allospironema culicis” “Altiarchaeum hamiconexum” “Altimarinus pacificus” “Aminicenans sakinawicola” “Amoebinatus massiliensis” “Amoebophilus asiaticus” “Amphibiichlamydia ranarum” “Amphibiichlamydia salamandrae” “Anammoxiglobus propionicus” “Anammoximicrobium moscoviense” “Aquiluna rubra” “Atelocyanobacterium thalassae” “Bandiella euplotis” “Blochmanniella camponoti” “Blochmanniella floridana” “Blochmanniella myrmotrichis” “Blochmanniella pennsylvanica” “Blochmanniella vafra” “Brevifilum fermentans” “Brocadia anammoxidans” “Brocadia sapporonensis” “Caenarcanum bioreactoricola” “Caldarchaeum subterraneum” “Caldatribacterium californiense” “Caldatribacterium saccharofermentans” “Calditenuis aerorheumatis” “Calescibacterium nevadense” “Captivus acidiprotistae” “Carbonibacillus altaicus” “Cardinium hertigii” “Catenimonas italica” “Cenarchaeum symbiosum” “Chloranaerofilum corporosum” “Chloroploca asiatica” “Chlorotrichoides halophilum” “Chryseopegocella kryptomonas” “Clavichlamydia salmonicola” “Cochliopodiiphilus cryoturris” “Combothrix italica” “Competibacter denitrificans” “Competibacter phosphatis” “Consessor aphidicola” “Contendibacter odensensis” “Contubernalis alkaliaceticus” “Criblamydia sequanensis” “Criblamydia” “Cryptoprodota polytropus” “Curculioniphilus buchneri” “Cyrtobacter comes” “Dactylopiibacterium carminicum” “Desulfofervidus auxilii” “Desulfonatronobulbus propionicus” “Doolittlea endobia” “Ecksteinia adelgidicola” “Electronema nielsenii” “Electronema palustre” Electrothrix arhusiensis Electrothrix communis Ts “Electrothrix japonica” “Electrothrix marina” “Endecteinascidia fromenterensis” “Endobugula glebosa” “Endobugula sertula” “Endolissoclinum faulkneri” “Endonucleibacter bathymodioli” “Endoriftia persephonae” “Endowatersipora glebosa” “Entotheonella factor” “Entotheonella palauensis” “Entotheonella serta” “Epixenosoma ejectans” “Epulonipiscioides gigas” “Epulonipiscioides saccharophilum” “Epulonipiscium fischelsonii” “Fervidibacter sacchari” “Finniella inopinata” “Finniella lucida” “Finniella” “Flaviluna lacus” “Fodinibacter communicans” “Fokinia crypta” “Fokinia solitaria” “Fritschea bemisiae” “Fritschea eriococci” “Fukatsuia symbiotica” “Galacturonatibacter soehngenii” “Mariprofundia” “Moduliflexia” “Thermofontia” “Vecturitrichia” “Actinomarinales” “Altiarchaeales” “Gastranaerophilales” “Moduliflexales” “Nitrosocaldales” “Vecturitrichales” “Accumulibacter phosphatis” Sulfuritelmatomonas gaucii Ts Electronema aureum Ts Electronema Electrothrix “Fervidibacter”
Abstract
We here present annotated lists of names ofCandidatustaxa of prokaryotes with ranks between subspecies and class, proposed between the mid-1990s, when the provisional status ofCandidatustaxa was first established, and the end of 2018. Where necessary, corrected names are proposed that comply with the current provisions of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes and its Orthography appendix. These lists, as well as updated lists of newly published names ofCandidatustaxa with additio

CANDIDATUS LIST No. 3. Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa

Citation
Oren, Garrity (2022). International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 72 (1)
Names
Elulimicrobiia “Saccharimonadia” “Ozemibacteria” “Caenarcanales” “Fibrimonadales” “Methanoflorentales” “Ozemibacterales” “Fibrimonadaceae” “Ozemibacteraceae” “Acidiflorens” “Annandiella” “Aramenus” “Arocatia” “Changshengia” “Cibionibacter” “Cuticulibacterium” “Didemniditutus” “Endohaliclona” “Euplotella” “Fibrimonas” “Forterrea” “Ischnodemia” “Neowolbachia” “Nitrobium” “Ozemibacter” “Paracaedimonas” “Parafinniella” “Pleuronema” “Reconciliibacillus” “Roseilinea” “Rubidus” “Stammera” “Theodorhartigia” “Acidiflorens stordalenmirensis” “Anadelfobacter sociabilis” “Anaerococcus massiliensis” “Anaerococcus phoceensis” “Anaerococcus timonensis” “Annandiella adelgistsugae” “Annandiella pinicola” “Aramenus sulfurataquae” “Arocatia carayonii” “Azospirillum massiliense” “Bandiella numerosa” “Desulfofervidia” “Macinerneyibacteriia” “Nanohalobiia” “Nanoperiodontomorbia” “Nanosyncoccia” “Syntrophaliphaticia” “Undinarchaeia” “Bartonella gerbillinarum” “Bartonella khokhlovae” “Bartonella negevensis” “Bartonella rudakovii” “Borrelia africana” “Borrelia ivorensis” “Borrelia fainii” “Brocadia braziliensis” “Cibionibacter quicibialis” “Clostridium massiliense” “Clostridium timonense” “Cuticulibacterium kirbyi” “Cytophaga massiliensis” “Desulfopertinax cowenii” Desulfosporosinus infrequens “Didemniditutus mandelae” “Ehrlichia regneryi” “Ehrlichia shimanensis” “Endohaliclona renieramycinifaciens” “Adiutricales” “Desulfofervidales” “Fermentimicrarchaeales” “Entotheonella gemina” “Euplotella sexta” “Finniella dimorpha” “Fibrimonas termitidis” “Forterrea multitransposorum” “Halobeggiatoa borealis” “Ischnodemia utriculi” “Liberibacter brunswickensis” “Mastigocoleus perforans” “Methanoflorens crillii” “Mycoplasma erythrocervae” “Guanabaribacteriales” “Hakubellales” “Macinerneyibacteriales” “Methylospongiales” “Naiadarchaeales” “Nanogingivalales” “Nanohalobiales” “Tepidaquicellales” “Adiutricaceae” “Aminobacteroidaceae” “Chazhemtonibacteriaceae” “Fermentimicrarchaeaceae” “Hakubellaceae” “Macinerneyibacteriaceae” “Magnetomoraceae” “Nanogingivalaceae” “Nanohalobiaceae” “Tepidaquicellaceae” “Thiobarbaceae” “Undinarchaeaceae” “Abditibacter” “Acidifodinimicrobium” “Aminobacteroides” “Anthektikosiphon” “Vallotia laricis” “Vallotia japonica” “Typhincola belonochilicola” “Treponema suis” “Mycoplasma haematomelis” “Nardonella dryophthoridicola” “Nardonella hylobii” “Neoehrlichia tanzaniensis” “Neowolbachia serbiensis” “Tokpelaia hoelldobleri” “Ozemibacter sibiricus” “Paracaedimonas acanthamoebae” “Parafinniella ignota” “Peptoniphilus massiliensis” “Piscichlamydia cyprini” “Pleuronema perforans” “Pleuronema testarum” “Profftia japonica” “Profftia laricis” “Pseudomonas adelgistsugae” “Reconciliibacillus cellulosivorans” “Rickettsia laoensis” “Rickettsia mahosoti” “Roseilinea gracilis” “Sedimenticola endophacoides” “Spiroplasma holothuriicola” “Stammera capsulata” “Synechococcus calcipolaris” “Theodorhartigia pinicola” “Thiosymbium robbeae” “Weimeria bifida”
Abstract

Proposal of names for 329 higher rank taxa defined in the Genome Taxonomy Database under two prokaryotic codes

Citation
Chuvochina et al. (2023). FEMS Microbiology Letters
Names
Leptospiria Alicyclobacillia Natranaerobiia Jeotgalibacillaceae Brevinematia Amphibacillaceae Chitinimonas Chitinimonadaceae Marinicellaceae Ahniellaceae Pseudohongiellaceae Methanoculleaceae Methanofollaceae Methanosphaerulaceae Methanocellia Methanosarcinia Methanonatronarchaeia Methanoliparia Halobacteriota Exiguobacteriales Exiguobacteriaceae Salinicoccaceae Staphylococcales Gemellaceae Thermicanales Thermicanaceae Neiellaceae Oceanococcaceae Wohlfahrtiimonadaceae Thermaerobacteria Thermaerobacterales Thermaerobacteraceae Sedimentibacteraceae Proteiniboraceae Monoglobaceae Monoglobales Lutisporaceae Lutisporales Lachnospirales Christensenellales Caldicoprobacterales Caldicellulosiruptoraceae Caldicellulosiruptorales Oxobacteraceae Caloramatoraceae Acetivibrionaceae Acetivibrio Acetivibrionales Clostridiisalibacter Clostridiisalibacteraceae Caldisalinibacter Dethiosulfatibacteraceae Thermincolales Thermincolia Carboxydocellales Carboxydocellaceae Tindalliaceae Thermotaleaceae Natronincolaceae Filifactoraceae Caminicellaceae Anaerovoracaceae Peptostreptococcales Acidaminobacteraceae Mahellales Mahellaceae Thermosulfidibacterota Thermosulfidibacteria Thermosulfidibacterales Thermosulfidibacteraceae Elainellaceae Elainellales Phormidesmidaceae Phormidesmidales Hydrogenothermales Desulfurobacteriia “Paceibacteria” Vampirovibrionaceae Vampirovibrionales Vampirovibrionia Binataceae Binatales Binatia Hydrothermia Hydrothermales Hydrothermaceae Azobacteroidaceae Bipolaricaulales Bipolaricaulaceae Bipolaricaulia Hepatobacteraceae Hepatoplasmataceae Johnevansiaceae Johnevansiales Kapaibacteriaceae Kapaibacteriales Magnetobacteriaceae Methylomirabilaceae Methylomirabilales Methylomirabilia Muiribacteriaceae Muiribacteriales Muiribacteriia Nucleicultricaceae Obscuribacteraceae Promineifilaceae Promineifilales Pseudothioglobaceae Puniceispirillaceae Puniceispirillales Saccharimonadaceae Saccharimonadales Tenderiaceae Tenderiales Thermobaculaceae Thermobaculales Desulforudaceae Methylomirabilota Cloacimonadia Cloacimonadales Cloacimonadaceae Kapaibacteriia “Poriferisulfidales” Leptolyngbyaceae
Abstract
Abstract The Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) is a taxonomic framework that defines prokaryotic taxa as monophyletic groups in concatenated protein reference trees according to systematic criteria. This has resulted in a substantial number of changes to existing classifications (https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org). In the case of union of taxa, GTDB names were applied based on the priority of publication. The division of taxa or change in rank led to the formation of new Latin names above

Candidatus List. Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus phyla

Citation
Oren, Göker (2023). International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 73 (5)
Names
“Caldatribacteriota” “Caldipriscota” “Calescibacteriota” “Canglongiota” “Deferrimicrobiota” “Dormiibacterota” “Eremiobacterota” “Fermentibacterota” “Fervidibacterota” “Freyrarchaeota” “Geothermarchaeota” “Heilongiota” “Hermodarchaeota” “Hinthialibacterota” “Huberarchaeota” “Hydrogenedentota” “Hydrothermota” “Iainarchaeota” “Kapaibacteriota” “Krumholzibacteriota” “Kryptoniota” “Kerfeldiibacteriota” “Komeiliibacteriota” “Levyibacteriota” “Lindowiibacteriota” “Liptoniibacteriota” “Lloydiibacteriota” “Magasanikiibacteriota” “Margulisiibacteriota” “Martarchaeota” “Melainobacteriota” “Moissliibacteriota” “Montesoliibacteriota” “Nealsoniibacteriota” “Nezhaarchaeota” “Niyogiibacteriota” “Nomuraibacteriota” “Pacearchaeota” “Peregrinibacteriota” “Poribacteriota” “Portnoyibacteriota” “Ratteibacteriota” “Raymondiibacteriota” “Roizmaniibacteriota” “Rokuibacteriota” “Ryaniibacteriota” “Saganiibacteriota” “Schekmaniibacteriota” “Spechtiibacteriota” “Stahliibacteriota” “Staskawicziibacteriota” “Sungiibacteriota” “Tagaibacteriota” “Tayloriibacteriota” “Tectimicrobiota” “Terryibacteriota” “Torokiibacteriota” “Uhriibacteriota” “Vebleniibacteriota” “Wolfeibacteriota” “Woykeibacteriota” “Yanofskyibacteriota” “Yonathiibacteriota” “Zambryskiibacteriota” “Abawacaibacteriota” “Augarchaeota” “Lokiarchaeota” “Macinerneyibacteriota” “Methanomethylicota” “Moduliflexota” “Nanohalarchaeota” “Neomarinimicrobiota” “Odinarchaeota” “Paceibacterota” “Parcunitrobacterota” “Parvarchaeota” “Poseidoniota” “Qinglongiota” “Saccharimonadota” “Sifarchaeota” “Sumerlaeota” “Tianyaibacteriota” “Undinarchaeota” “Wukongarchaeota” “Babelota” “Wirthibacterota” “Rifleibacteriota” “Joergenseniibacteriota” “Kueneniibacteriota” “Jacksoniibacteriota” “Moraniibacteriota” “Shapirobacteriota” “Zixiibacteriota” Cloacimonadota Muiribacteriota “Latescibacterota” “Acetithermota” “Aenigmatarchaeota” “Aerophobota” “Altiarchaeota” “Altimarinota” “Aminicenantota”
Abstract

Extensive microbial diversity within the chicken gut microbiome revealed by metagenomics and culture

Citation
Gilroy et al. (2021). PeerJ 9
Names
“Limivivens” “Allolimicola stercorigallinarum” “Allolimicola” “Alectryobacillus merdavium” “Alectryobacillus” “Gemmiger faecavium” “Barnesiella excrementigallinarum” “Blautia stercoravium” “Desulfovibrio intestinigallinarum” “Limosilactobacillus merdigallinarum” “Acinetobacter avistercoris” “Anaerobiospirillum pullistercoris” “Gemmiger excrementipullorum” “Evtepia faecigallinarum” “Anaerofilum excrementigallinarum” “Acutalibacter pullistercoris” “Barnesiella excrementavium” “Evtepia faecavium” “Agathobaculum merdavium” “Eisenbergiella pullistercoris” “Tetragenococcus pullicola” “Alistipes intestinigallinarum” “Luteimonas excrementigallinarum” “Intestinimonas merdavium” “Sphingobacterium stercorigallinarum” “Rubneribacter avistercoris” “Rothia avicola” “Companilactobacillus pullicola” “Tidjanibacter faecipullorum” “Ruania gallistercoris” “Fournierella merdipullorum” “Gemmiger excrementavium” “Atopostipes pullistercoris” “Lactobacillus pullistercoris” “Janibacter merdipullorum” “Mucispirillum faecigallinarum” “Ligilactobacillus excrementavium” “Collinsella stercoripullorum” “Microbacterium stercoravium” “Mediterraneibacter merdipullorum” “Mediterraneibacter pullicola” “Fournierella merdigallinarum” “Mediterraneibacter merdigallinarum” “Limosilactobacillus excrementigallinarum” “Agathobaculum intestinipullorum” “Brevibacterium intestinavium” “Brachybacterium merdavium” “Desulfovibrio intestinavium” “Bariatricus faecipullorum” “Alistipes avicola” “Phocaeicola faecigallinarum” “Blautia merdipullorum” “Desulfovibrio gallistercoris” “Fournierella merdavium” “Fournierella excrementigallinarum” “Mailhella merdavium” “Nosocomiicoccus stercorigallinarum” “Eisenbergiella merdigallinarum” “Ligilactobacillus avistercoris” “Eisenbergiella merdavium” “Alistipes stercoravium” “Dietzia intestinipullorum” “Mediterraneibacter faecipullorum” “Mediterraneibacter faecigallinarum” “Dietzia intestinigallinarum” “Anaerostipes avistercoris” “Blautia merdavium” “Phocaeicola excrementigallinarum” “Corynebacterium faecigallinarum” “Mediterraneibacter excrementavium” “Acutalibacter stercorigallinarum” “Blautia stercorigallinarum” “Butyricicoccus avistercoris” “Eisenbergiella stercoravium” “Mediterraneibacter vanvlietii” “Acetatifactor stercoripullorum” “Borkfalkia faecipullorum” “Hungatella pullicola” “Blautia pullistercoris” “Anaerostipes excrementavium” “Fusicatenibacter merdavium” “Anaerotignum merdipullorum” “Mediterraneibacter stercoripullorum” “Borkfalkia excrementigallinarum” “Faecalibacterium gallistercoris” “Mediterraneibacter pullistercoris” “Limosilactobacillus intestinipullorum” “Intestinimonas stercoravium” “Merdibacter merdigallinarum” “Gemmiger stercoripullorum” “Borkfalkia stercoripullorum” “Enterocloster excrementipullorum” “Merdibacter merdavium” “Eisenbergiella intestinipullorum” “Gemmiger stercoravium” “Ruthenibacterium merdavium” “Mediterraneibacter excrementigallinarum”
Abstract
Background The chicken is the most abundant food animal in the world. However, despite its importance, the chicken gut microbiome remains largely undefined. Here, we exploit culture-independent and culture-dependent approaches to reveal extensive taxonomic diversity within this complex microbial community. Results We performed metagenomic sequencing of fifty chicken faecal samples from two breeds and analysed these, alongside all (n = 582) relevant publicly available chicken metagenomes, to c

Hyperactive nanobacteria with host-dependent traits pervade Omnitrophota

Citation
Seymour et al. (2023). Nature Microbiology 8 (4)
Names
“Multiplicimicrobium” “Fredricksoniimonas aquilentivivens” “Amyimicrobium” “Omnitrophia” “Omnitrophales” “Omnitrophaceae” “Pluralincolimonas frigidipaludosa” “Fontincolimonas calida” “Profunditerraquicola sanfordiae” “Fredricksoniimonas borealis” “Duberdicusella sinuisediminis” “Phelpsiimicrobium noxiivivens” “Velesiimonas alkalicola” “Aquitaenariimonas noxiae” “Aquincolibacterium aerophilum” “Aquincolibacterium lacustre” “Multiplicimicrobium inquinatum” “Pegaeibacterium caenilacustre” “Danuiimicrobium aquiferis” “Taenariivivens baikalensis” “Aquivivens invisus” “Abzuiibacterium crystallinum” “Makaraimicrobium” “Aquincolibacterium” “Pegaeibacterium” “Aquivivens” “Duberdicusellaceae” “Pluralincolimonadaceae” “Taenariiviventaceae” “Aquincolibacteriaceae” “Aquiviventaceae” “Duberdicusellales” “Ghiorseimicrobiales” “Aquitaenariimonadales” “Velesiimonadales” “Aquiviventales” “Undivivens” “Taenaricolales” “Undivivens industriae” “Sherwoodlollariibacterium unditelluris” “Sherwoodlollariibacterium” “Fontincolimonas” “Aquitaenariimonadaceae” “Profunditerraquicola” “Profunditerraquicolaceae” “Amyimicrobium silvilacustre” “Ghiorseimicrobiaceae” “Ghiorseimicrobium” “Ghiorseimicrobium undicola” “Fredricksoniimonadaceae” “Fredricksoniimonas” “Phelpsiimicrobium” “Pluralincolimonadales” “Duberdicusella” “Velesiimonadaceae” “Velesiimonas” “Taenaricolaceae” “Taenaricola” “Taenaricola geyseris” “Pluralincolimonas” “Aquitaenariimonas” “Makaraimicrobium thalassicum” “Taenariivivens” “Danuiimicrobiaceae” “Danuiimicrobium” “Aquiviventia” “Abzuiibacterium” “Abzuiibacteriaceae” Omnitrophus Omnitrophus fodinae Ts Omnitrophota
Abstract
AbstractCandidate bacterial phylum Omnitrophota has not been isolated and is poorly understood. We analysed 72 newly sequenced and 349 existing Omnitrophota genomes representing 6 classes and 276 species, along with Earth Microbiome Project data to evaluate habitat, metabolic traits and lifestyles. We applied fluorescence-activated cell sorting and differential size filtration, and showed that most Omnitrophota are ultra-small (~0.2 μm) cells that are found in water, sediments and soils. Omnitro

Diversity and taxonomic revision of methanogens and other archaea in the intestinal tract of terrestrial arthropods

Citation
Protasov et al. (2023). Frontiers in Microbiology 14
Names
Methanogranum gryphiswaldense Ts Methanogranum Bathycorpusculaceae Methanimicrococcus labiotermitis Methanoplasma cognatum Methanofrustulum fimipullorum Ts Methanofilum Methanolapillus Methanomicula Methanomicula labiotermitis Ts Bathycorpusculum acetigenes Ts Bathycorpusculum acidaminoxidans Bathycorpusculum grumuli Bathycorpusculum terrae Methanolapillus millepedarum Ts Methanolapillus africanus Methanimicrococcus stummii Methanimicrococcus odontotermitis Methanimicrococcus hongohii Methanimicrococcus hacksteinii Methanoplasma reticulitermitis Methanoplasma porotermitis Methanoplasma glyptotermitis Methanofrustulum Bathycorpusculum fermentans Bathycorpusculum termitum Methanorbis Methanorbis rubei Methanorbis furvi Ts Methanorbis basalitermitum Methanacia Methanacia filiformis Ts Methanarmilla Bathycorpusculum Bathycorpusculum soli Methanofilum arcanum Ts Methanocatella Methanocatella smithii Ts Methanocatella gottschalkii Methanocatella millerae Methanocatella oralis Methanocatella thaueri Methanocatella woesei Methanarmilla wolinii Ts Methanarmilla boviskoreani Methanobinarius Methanobinarius arboriphilus Ts Methanobinarius endosymbioticus Methanobaculum Methanobaculum cuticulare Ts Methanoflexus Methanoflexus curvatus Ts Methanoflexus mossambicus Methanorudis Methanovirga Methanovirga aequatorialis Methanovirga australis Methanovirga basalitermitum Ts Methanovirga meridionalis Methanovirga procula Methanolapillus ohkumae Bathycorpusculum hydrogenotrophicum Methanorudis spinitermitis Ts Methanomethylophilus alvi T
Abstract
Methane emission by terrestrial invertebrates is restricted to millipedes, termites, cockroaches, and scarab beetles. The arthropod-associated archaea known to date belong to the orders Methanobacteriales, Methanomassiliicoccales, Methanomicrobiales, and Methanosarcinales, and in a few cases also to non-methanogenic Nitrososphaerales and Bathyarchaeales. However, all major host groups are severely undersampled, and the taxonomy of existing lineages is not well developed. Full-length 16S rRNA gen

An updated classification of cyanobacterial orders and families based on phylogenomic and polyphasic analysis

Citation
Strunecký et al. (2023). Journal of Phycology 59 (1)
Names
Perforafilum Laspinema Aphanizomenaceae Vampirovibrionophyceae Leptolyngbya Leptolyngbyales Cyanophyceae Geminocystaceae Chroococcales Rivulariaceae Rivularia Synechococcaceae Nostocaceae Nostocales Chroococcus Gomontiellaceae Gomontiella Gomontiellales Microcystaceae Coelomoron Pseudanabaena Asterocapsa Chroococcaceae Chalicogloea Mantellum Woronichinia Cyanonephron Pannus Cyanocatena Cyanogranis Cyanotetras Siphonosphaera Coelosphaeriopsis Synechocystis Cyanoaggregatum Eucapsis Crocosphaera Aphanocapsa Coelosphaerium Gloeothece Cyanostylon Entophysalis Hormothece Dzensia Pseudoncobyrsa Merismopedia Cyanogastrum Phormidium Ancylothrix Microcoleus Microcoleaceae Prochlorococcus Aliinostoc Nodulariaceae Spirulina Spirulinaceae Spirulinales Gloeobacterales Dapis Heteroleibleinia
Abstract
Cyanobacterial taxonomy is facing a period of rapid changes thanks to the ease of 16S rRNA gene sequencing and established workflows for description of new taxa. Since the last comprehensive review of the cyanobacterial system in 2014 until 2021, at least 273 species in 140 genera were newly described. These taxa were mainly placed into previously defined orders and families although several new families were proposed. However, the classification of most taxa still relied on hierarchical relatio

A comprehensive overview of the Chloroflexota community in wastewater treatment plants worldwide